Building A "Premier Community"
It's spring. Real estate sales are in the tank. The fix-up hormones are ragging. The head of the House Police is bored. The snow birds will soon depart. The TAMPOA Board has little or nothing to do. The hammers and tools are out. It's the perfect time unwittingly to drive another nail into the coffin containing the perception of Truman Annex as a place where any sane down to earth person would want to call home.
So why not, in an "ongoing effort to ensure that the Truman Annex remains a premier community" conclusively demonstrate it is truly the most hoity-toidy, socially elite, snobbish, vapid place on earth by unleashing the House Police to conduct "regular inspections of individual homes." In performing their anointed duty these stealthy zealots, armed with knowledge from a largely unknown, predominately secret, book of arcane "rules" on everything trivial a Type-A-Personality conformist could possibly want to know, fan out from house to house. Everything about house fronts, colors, paint, varnish, trim, soffits, borders, gutters, overhang, nails, screws, windows, curtain-backing, shutter-trim, wood, appearance, house-makeup and snob appeal that even Martha Stewart has wisely forgotten is within their grasp, or so it seems.
At each and every house these anointed House Police "inspect" and dutifully check compliance with the Big Book. They don't carry the Big Book with them, but they know what they are looking for -- evidence of a "premier community" -- a sort of "I-know-it-when-I-see-it-but-can't-define-it" thing. Evidence that a "premier community" may not be entirely present at a particular residence is duly noted.
After that, the unsuspecting Annex resident gets a rather official looking form letter direct from the flying fingers of an underpaid female in the TAMPOA office and signed in doctor script by the Major-domo himself. The letter is addressed in a snottily familiar first name fashion; the way patients are sometimes spoken to in hospitals and doctors' offices -- a kind of disingenuously comforting familiarity. "Dear Mabel: . . . We are here to give you an enema. And you can't be wearing those earrings here." Never mind that Mabel is old enough to be their grand mother. Never mind that Mabel doesn't know them from Jack the Ripper. Never mind that Mabel may feel a certain lack of respect at this shallow familiarity. Never mind that Mabel hates their friggin' guts. The greeting is still "Dear Mabel: we're about to tell you something stupid," as if having just insulted Mabel will make what she is about to be told not seem to be so idiotic.
After this all too familiar greeting, the letter to the unsuspecting Annex resident begins: "As part of the ongoing effort to ensure that the Truman Annex remains a premier community, regular inspections of individual homes are conducted. It was recently noted that your property is in need of the following maintenance and repairs: . . . ." The resident never learns what the "it" is in the preceding sentence since English 101 is not a prerequisite for writing such letters.
Then comes a bullet point description of the rule violation. We've had a chance to look at a number of these letters. Among the more typical and trivial (but certainly not the most trivial) are several like "Your plantings are not approved" (yards are inspected too) or "The address plate on your unit is in the wrong color." (The latter "violation" refers to the approximately 8 inch by 6 inch oval plaque on which the house numbers appear.) We were waiting for a citation (similar to one issued a few years ago) about the plastic chairs on the porch or the door mat that reads "Spoiled pussy lives here." However, in recent years under the current administration, cats seem to be getting more favored treatment.
None of the letters cite an actual rule. They simply indicate what TAMPOA's Major-domo thinks is a violation. The form letter goes on to say that "The items listed . . . require your immediate attention so that your home will conform to Association standards." There is no reference as to what the "standards" are or where they might be found.
The letter then continues: "It is important that you fulfill your obligation as a homeowner so that we all can continue to take pride in the Truman Annex." One is tempted to wonder what "we" made the judgment to spend the considerable sum these letters to "ensure that the Truman Annex remains a premier community" cost, so "we" can have "pride" in the Annex, but "we" already know the answer to that one, don't "we."
If by now the surprised letter recipient isn't pissed-off, the next paragraph of the letter is sure to do it. Even though the resident, like some we know, has no vegetation to speak of in his yard, the letter continues in if-the-shoe-fits fashion: "In addition to the items listed above, it may be time to remove general overgrowth, cut back foliage, trim palm trees to a neat condition so that no fronds are touching the building [which, in the case of a house, the resident owns], remove all coconuts, and be sure that there is approximately a 50/50 ratio of plants to open space maintained in your yard [meaning get your sorry ass out there and plant some plants, but be sure they're approved]. Landscape material that extends over a sidewalk, roadway or common area more than twelve inches from the property line below a height of seven (7) feet is not permitted." Again, no reference in the letter to a rule, just the statement it "is not permitted."
The reason TAMPOA gets away with this kind of crap is that almost none of the residents of the Annex have a bleeping clue as to what all is in this Big Book because no one has an up to date copy. That fact is not an accident. By limiting knowledge the power of the few with knowledge is increased. Annex residents are forced to depend on the Chief of the House Police, who will always, in turn, refer you to the Major-domo for a belated reference to chapter and verse residing somewhere in the bowels of the rather outdated record archive TAMPOA "maintains." (In retrospect, "maintains" may be a misnomer because it was from a similar record-keeping endeavor that TAMPOA did not discover that it already had a title insurance policy that included Southard Street before allowing its lawyers to rack up a small fortune in legal bills researching its apparently already existing title to Southard Street. But that's another story.)
So if you want the correct information, you are doomed if you think you can figure it out for yourself. Instead you must call or write the Major-domo and ask whether he is serious or is this just an April Fool thing. Of course he's going to tell you he's damned serious. And even though he can't at that moment, or any other moment nearby, cite chapter and verse to you, he'll tell you, in a way that only Major-domos and Assistant City Managers can, that any thought of resistance is futile. That's because if you don't comply, TAMPOA can effectively block the sale of your house, and you will not be able to sell it until you comply. If you weren't thinking of selling, by the time you get off the phone you will want to do so immediately.
The final paragraph of the form letter suggests that the TAMPOA website "is very helpful." Like a true believer in the tooth fairy and the Easter Pussy you trot on over to the website to look for the code that supports the breach of "premier community-dom" that you have allegedly committed. You are not there long before you realize you've been wasting your time, and the rules you were looking for are not there. So you go away realizing there is probably noting you can do.
And then you happen run into someone who asks you what its like living in Truman Annex. "How much time have you got," you ask? "Did you know the Annex wants to remain a premier community?"
So why not, in an "ongoing effort to ensure that the Truman Annex remains a premier community" conclusively demonstrate it is truly the most hoity-toidy, socially elite, snobbish, vapid place on earth by unleashing the House Police to conduct "regular inspections of individual homes." In performing their anointed duty these stealthy zealots, armed with knowledge from a largely unknown, predominately secret, book of arcane "rules" on everything trivial a Type-A-Personality conformist could possibly want to know, fan out from house to house. Everything about house fronts, colors, paint, varnish, trim, soffits, borders, gutters, overhang, nails, screws, windows, curtain-backing, shutter-trim, wood, appearance, house-makeup and snob appeal that even Martha Stewart has wisely forgotten is within their grasp, or so it seems.
At each and every house these anointed House Police "inspect" and dutifully check compliance with the Big Book. They don't carry the Big Book with them, but they know what they are looking for -- evidence of a "premier community" -- a sort of "I-know-it-when-I-see-it-but-can't-define-it" thing. Evidence that a "premier community" may not be entirely present at a particular residence is duly noted.
After that, the unsuspecting Annex resident gets a rather official looking form letter direct from the flying fingers of an underpaid female in the TAMPOA office and signed in doctor script by the Major-domo himself. The letter is addressed in a snottily familiar first name fashion; the way patients are sometimes spoken to in hospitals and doctors' offices -- a kind of disingenuously comforting familiarity. "Dear Mabel: . . . We are here to give you an enema. And you can't be wearing those earrings here." Never mind that Mabel is old enough to be their grand mother. Never mind that Mabel doesn't know them from Jack the Ripper. Never mind that Mabel may feel a certain lack of respect at this shallow familiarity. Never mind that Mabel hates their friggin' guts. The greeting is still "Dear Mabel: we're about to tell you something stupid," as if having just insulted Mabel will make what she is about to be told not seem to be so idiotic.
After this all too familiar greeting, the letter to the unsuspecting Annex resident begins: "As part of the ongoing effort to ensure that the Truman Annex remains a premier community, regular inspections of individual homes are conducted. It was recently noted that your property is in need of the following maintenance and repairs: . . . ." The resident never learns what the "it" is in the preceding sentence since English 101 is not a prerequisite for writing such letters.
Then comes a bullet point description of the rule violation. We've had a chance to look at a number of these letters. Among the more typical and trivial (but certainly not the most trivial) are several like "Your plantings are not approved" (yards are inspected too) or "The address plate on your unit is in the wrong color." (The latter "violation" refers to the approximately 8 inch by 6 inch oval plaque on which the house numbers appear.) We were waiting for a citation (similar to one issued a few years ago) about the plastic chairs on the porch or the door mat that reads "Spoiled pussy lives here." However, in recent years under the current administration, cats seem to be getting more favored treatment.
None of the letters cite an actual rule. They simply indicate what TAMPOA's Major-domo thinks is a violation. The form letter goes on to say that "The items listed . . . require your immediate attention so that your home will conform to Association standards." There is no reference as to what the "standards" are or where they might be found.
The letter then continues: "It is important that you fulfill your obligation as a homeowner so that we all can continue to take pride in the Truman Annex." One is tempted to wonder what "we" made the judgment to spend the considerable sum these letters to "ensure that the Truman Annex remains a premier community" cost, so "we" can have "pride" in the Annex, but "we" already know the answer to that one, don't "we."
If by now the surprised letter recipient isn't pissed-off, the next paragraph of the letter is sure to do it. Even though the resident, like some we know, has no vegetation to speak of in his yard, the letter continues in if-the-shoe-fits fashion: "In addition to the items listed above, it may be time to remove general overgrowth, cut back foliage, trim palm trees to a neat condition so that no fronds are touching the building [which, in the case of a house, the resident owns], remove all coconuts, and be sure that there is approximately a 50/50 ratio of plants to open space maintained in your yard [meaning get your sorry ass out there and plant some plants, but be sure they're approved]. Landscape material that extends over a sidewalk, roadway or common area more than twelve inches from the property line below a height of seven (7) feet is not permitted." Again, no reference in the letter to a rule, just the statement it "is not permitted."
The reason TAMPOA gets away with this kind of crap is that almost none of the residents of the Annex have a bleeping clue as to what all is in this Big Book because no one has an up to date copy. That fact is not an accident. By limiting knowledge the power of the few with knowledge is increased. Annex residents are forced to depend on the Chief of the House Police, who will always, in turn, refer you to the Major-domo for a belated reference to chapter and verse residing somewhere in the bowels of the rather outdated record archive TAMPOA "maintains." (In retrospect, "maintains" may be a misnomer because it was from a similar record-keeping endeavor that TAMPOA did not discover that it already had a title insurance policy that included Southard Street before allowing its lawyers to rack up a small fortune in legal bills researching its apparently already existing title to Southard Street. But that's another story.)
So if you want the correct information, you are doomed if you think you can figure it out for yourself. Instead you must call or write the Major-domo and ask whether he is serious or is this just an April Fool thing. Of course he's going to tell you he's damned serious. And even though he can't at that moment, or any other moment nearby, cite chapter and verse to you, he'll tell you, in a way that only Major-domos and Assistant City Managers can, that any thought of resistance is futile. That's because if you don't comply, TAMPOA can effectively block the sale of your house, and you will not be able to sell it until you comply. If you weren't thinking of selling, by the time you get off the phone you will want to do so immediately.
The final paragraph of the form letter suggests that the TAMPOA website "is very helpful." Like a true believer in the tooth fairy and the Easter Pussy you trot on over to the website to look for the code that supports the breach of "premier community-dom" that you have allegedly committed. You are not there long before you realize you've been wasting your time, and the rules you were looking for are not there. So you go away realizing there is probably noting you can do.
And then you happen run into someone who asks you what its like living in Truman Annex. "How much time have you got," you ask? "Did you know the Annex wants to remain a premier community?"
Labels: TAMPOA Website, Truman Annex
17 Comments:
What a post! Great reading for anyone in support or Orwellian-style communities - especially in Key West.
The Major Domo is a strange mongrel animal, seemingly satisfied only when exerting control, incesently trying to subjugate, like a rooster who had pecked into a tub of viagra.
I say let your freak flag fly! Life's too short.
Yes, it is an absurdity that the TAMPOA homeowners association management, despite its ludicrous level of renumeration, wants some to believe that it is well organized while in reality it is so woefully lacking in its communication with the homeowners that it pretends to serve. The lack of substantive timely communication from TAMPOA to the homeowners (that you have outlined so well, Conchette) further destroys any remaining credibility that the TAMPOA management may still have with homeowners let alone the community at large. Perhaps the realization is simple: If something is based on increasing lies and squandering of people's money (and the people are figuring that out), then it may be best not to provide further information to the people (and fear looking even more ridiculous and potentially accelerate losing your lucrative position if the truth gets out). Also, thank you, Conchette, for now being accessible through www.tampoa.info. It's much easier than typing all that "tampon" stuff and your blog is certainly more informative, current, and dynamic than the tampoa.com site which is totally worthless. Keep up the good work!
Please see cayo dave's blog site to see why he fits Konkette's definition of a troll. The question is why he is permitted to publish here when he seems to violate the TAMPON's policy of refusing to publish responses by "trolls"
What's most interesting is how someone like Konky ever came to live in a gated home-owner-associated community if such regulations are so anathema to "them", and why K-O Dave spends so much of his time obsessing over what goes on in this horrible community.....
When you live in a home owners association, there are rules which need to be followed. If you violated the rules just correct the violation and stop whining. Most of us have been cited at one time or another. Get over it.
You are going to be disappointed: We had absolutely nothing to do with putting up the site called "tampoa.info." In fact, the first time we learned of its existence was from your post. We don't approve of someone mirroring our blog without our permission. And we certainly don't approve of the use of the name "tampoa.info" for doing that.
We ask that whoever has done this please stop now! Take down the pointing reference in that site to our blog.
We don't know who you are or whether you had anything to do with putting up "tampoa.info," but if you did, or you know who did, please know that we do not approve and that the one that did does not have our permission to mirror or point to our blog site. If it is you, please stop now. If you know who did, let them know to please stop now.
Merely because a site name is easier to type is not an excuse for piracy of a blog belonging to someone else.
Our blog name may be longer to type, but once a person finds us all he has to do is bookmark our blog site and then no typing is required.
To Gigi:
We do not think Cayo Dave fits the definition of a "troll" in the sense of how that term has been used with reference to the internet. Otherwise, he would not be permitted to post here.
We know there are likely to be "rules" in most homeowners' associations. The problem with TAMPOA is that no one seems to have a clue what they ALL are. They are not published in any one accessible source. And now you have not just the TAMPOA Board making them up, but the Architectural Review Committee as well. You can't find many, if not most, of these rules on the TAMPOA web site.
And, the House Police frequently make mistakes, calling something a violation when in fact it is not or thinking there is a rule relating to a house violation when in fact the rule referred to by the House Police either does not say what they think it says or, worse, does not exist at all.
Cayo Dave has called individuals in truman annex d***heads and s***heads. Why doesn't this conform to your definition of trolls and why should individuals who slander and call others vile names be given a platform in your bolg to publish?
If you can't find the rules on the web site then get off your duff and walk over to the office. It's not hard and either Stephanie or Sterling will help you. Again just fix the violations and get over it. The rules apply to all who live here. (You included)
Twas written about the TAMPOA directors:
> ...potentially accelerate losing your
> lucrative position if the truth gets out
I hate to tell that troller this, but the TAMPOA directors get paid ZILCH for their efforts (and for having to put up with such BS as this blog promotes).
Thanks for asking, Gigi. We have not had the experience you describe with Cayo Dave. He has not used the kind of language you describe here on this blog, nor are we aware of the precise context of your allegations. Our concern and our publication policies -- which is what we assume you are are talking about, not Cayo Dave -- relate to what goes on here, not somewhere else.
We publish Cayo Dave for the ssame reasons that we publish you: to provide a wide range of views, even those we may not agree with all the time, so that our readers can make up their own minds about what they think and so that there can be a wide range of discussion about the issues we and our commenters might raise.
What we are not interested in is the flip side of your comment, and that is trying to ban someone from this blog because you or other commenters may not like him or because you or others are afraid of his point of view. We think you and others need to HEAR these points of view, even if you may not agree with them.
We encourage you and others to LISTEN FOR NEW INFORMATION -- THINGS YOU MAY NOT HAVE HEARD BEFORE in comments with which you may not initially (or ever) agree. Listening for new information that is not a personal attack is one of the things we do in deciding whether to publish a comment. It is what we heard (beyond the off-beat words) in your comment and why we published it.
So you have to listen BEYOND THE WORDS for new information before you write-off what someone says or is trying to say. Perhaps then you can understand them, even if you don't agree with them. And UNDERSTANDING WHERE SOMEONE IS COMING FROM IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN AGREEING WITH THEM. If you can't or won't understand where someone is coming from, there is no possibility of ever agreeing with them on anything.
Anonymous, we are "off our duff" every day looking for the news you read. We don't disagree with having rules. We just disagree with trying to enforce rules that don't exist and with unequal enforcement of the rules. That is what is happening under the current attempt to "ensure that the Truman Annex remains a premier community."
So we will continue to fight such stupid and short sighted attempts at thought control and to make little big-box automatons out of the Annex residents.
Anonymous ZILCH: Seems like the quotes you refer to lack a contextual reference.
We know the Directors are volunteers and applaud them for that. That fact, however, does not insulate them from responsibility for mistakes they may make; nor for responsibility for their part of what is happening to the Truman Annex and for the mismanagement that they have allowed to occur.
You may think much of what is said here is, as you call it, "BS" -- is that "Bush Syndrome" or "Busy Stuff?" We don't agree. And no one is forcing the TAMPOA Directors to "put up with" anything. There is a simple solution: turn off the computer or switch to "another channel."
But we suspect that you and the Directors wouldn't be posting here if you really felt the way you say you do. We're glad you like reading this blog, even if you don't always agree with what's here. So keep reading and fuming if you must.
"Rule that don't exist"!? Again if you have questions go to the office and find the answers. I don't understand your problem other than complaining about being cited. Just correct the problem and move on.
I don't understand...every time I ever bought a house in an association, I always had to pay hundreds of dollars for an approved copy of all the regulations. I also had to sign a disclosure saying I got the documents, read them, and would obey. If I got one of those letters, you can bet I'd be pulling out my rule book and fighting the association. Having been on a board myself, I've seen this crap from both sides of the proverbial fence.
Anonymous "rule that don't exsist":
Yes, TAMPOA in some instances has accused people of violating a rule that does not say what they think it says. Call it poor drafting or whatever; if you are going to have a rule that says X is a violation, it had better say X is a violation, not Y is a violation.
Unfortunately, either the House Police can't read (which is certainly a possibility) or the Rule-makers can't write clearly (which is also a possibility).
Annex residents should not be left to guess at a rule's meaning or speculate as to its application, nor should they have to rely upon the whimsical ad hoc interpretation of a Jefe or Major Domo. Where's the justice in that?
Oh, we forgot, this is an "Ass-o-cia-tion." There is no Balm in Gilead.
Post a Comment
<< Home