Mayor Served With TAMPOA's Federal Suit
TAMPOA's attorneys have made an effort to insure early and timely service of its lawsuit papers on the City and avoid any potential difficulty in complying with a Federal Judge's Pretrial Order issued in the newly re-filed case by TAMPOA against the City. (TAMPOA's prior federal suit was dismissed because of a failure to file a required scheduling report in a timely manner). TAMPOA's attorneys have hired a process server who promptly served the new Summons and Complaint on the City on May 9, 2007. The new Summons and complaint were served on Mayor Morgan McPherson at 525 Angela Street. The declaration by the process server that the Mayor had been served was filed with the Federal Court on February 14, 2007.
According to the Federal Court Clerk's Office, the City's Answer is due on June 8, 2007. Our guess is that the City will ask for an extension of time.
As he did in the prior (dismissed) case, the Federal Judge, on May 10, 2007, issued a Pretrial Order. That Order requires, among other things, that the attorneys for TAMPOA, forward a copy of the Order to all the defendants upon receipt of a responsive pleading. The Court's Pretrial Order was issued on May 10, 2007 and sets out the various procedural matters the judge expects the parties to deal with prior to the trial as well as deadlines for completing that work. Of course there is no reason for the City's attorneys to wait to be served with the Pretrial Order, since it is available from the Federal Court Clerk's Office or by a phone call to the Andersen Firm (TAMPOA's attorneys). The City's attorneys can get it, if they have not seen it already, and get a head start on complying with it.
A joint pretrial scheduling conference required by the court's Order of May 10, 2007 must be held no later than 20 days after the answer or other responsive pleading filed by the last responding defendant, or within 60 days after the filing of the complaint, whichever is sooner. This likely would make the scheduling conference occur sometime around July 9, 2007, unless the United States had not been served by that time. If so, according to the federal court's order, TAMPOA would be obligated to request the federal court to extend the time to hold the scheduling conference. However, at the rate TAMPOA is moving, if the United States has not been served, it likely will have been by July 9.
Within 10 days of the joint scheduling conference counsel for the parties must file a joint report with the judge. (It was the parties' failure to file this report that lead the judge to dismiss the case the last time around). According to sources at the Federal Court, a plaintiff's counsel (in this case TAMPOA's counsel) generally has the primary job of preparing and submitting the report.
According to the Federal Court Clerk's Office, the City's Answer is due on June 8, 2007. Our guess is that the City will ask for an extension of time.
As he did in the prior (dismissed) case, the Federal Judge, on May 10, 2007, issued a Pretrial Order. That Order requires, among other things, that the attorneys for TAMPOA, forward a copy of the Order to all the defendants upon receipt of a responsive pleading. The Court's Pretrial Order was issued on May 10, 2007 and sets out the various procedural matters the judge expects the parties to deal with prior to the trial as well as deadlines for completing that work. Of course there is no reason for the City's attorneys to wait to be served with the Pretrial Order, since it is available from the Federal Court Clerk's Office or by a phone call to the Andersen Firm (TAMPOA's attorneys). The City's attorneys can get it, if they have not seen it already, and get a head start on complying with it.
A joint pretrial scheduling conference required by the court's Order of May 10, 2007 must be held no later than 20 days after the answer or other responsive pleading filed by the last responding defendant, or within 60 days after the filing of the complaint, whichever is sooner. This likely would make the scheduling conference occur sometime around July 9, 2007, unless the United States had not been served by that time. If so, according to the federal court's order, TAMPOA would be obligated to request the federal court to extend the time to hold the scheduling conference. However, at the rate TAMPOA is moving, if the United States has not been served, it likely will have been by July 9.
Within 10 days of the joint scheduling conference counsel for the parties must file a joint report with the judge. (It was the parties' failure to file this report that lead the judge to dismiss the case the last time around). According to sources at the Federal Court, a plaintiff's counsel (in this case TAMPOA's counsel) generally has the primary job of preparing and submitting the report.
Labels: Federal Case, Lawsuit, Mayor, TAMPOA
posted by Conchette at 10:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home